Some of Whom vs Some of Who — Correct Usage & Examples

“Some of whom” is correct. “Some of who” is wrong. The word “of” is a preposition. Prepositions require objective case pronouns. “Whom” is objective case (like him, her, them). “Who” is subjective case (like he, she, they). You say “some of them,” never “some of they”—same logic applies to whom/who. Modern English is slowly killing “whom” in speech, but formal writing still demands it after prepositions.

Why Does Your Brain Hate This Rule?

Your confusion isn’t stupidity. It’s evolution.

English used to mark case on every noun and pronoun like German does. By 1200 CE, most case endings died. Your brain learned English without clear case markers because modern spoken English barely uses them.

Now formal writing demands “whom” after prepositions. Your brain rebels because the rule feels unnatural. Truth is, you don’t use case markers when you talk. “Who did you see?” sounds right even though grammar books say “Whom did you see?” Your left inferior frontal gyrus processes case differences, but it needs training to catch “of who” as wrong.

Here’s the thing: spoken English is dropping “whom” entirely. Formal writing preserves it as a fossil. That gap between speech and writing creates the confusion.

Core Concepts and Historical Evolution

English inherited case marking from Old English. Old English had four cases like Latin: nominative (subject), accusative (direct object), dative (indirect object), genitive (possessive). By 1500, nearly all case markers vanished except in pronouns. “Whom” survives as the last accusative/dative form we use regularly.

Etymology and Old English Case System Erosion

Old English used “hwā” (pronounced “hwah”) for “who” in nominative case. The accusative and dative forms merged into “hwām” (pronounced “hwahm”). This became Middle English “whom” by 1200.

Indo-European languages love case marking. Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, German—all mark case with different word endings. English started that way. Old English forced you to learn different pronoun forms based on grammatical function.

The Norman Conquest (1066) accelerated case erosion. French speakers simplified English grammar as they learned it. By 1500, most nouns had lost case endings. Only pronouns kept them: I/me, he/him, she/her, they/them, who/whom.

Why did “whom” survive at all? Prepositions. English speakers felt the need to mark object relationships after “of,” “with,” “to,” “from.” We kept “whom” in phrases like “to whom” and “of whom” even as we dropped it elsewhere.

Grammatical Mechanics and Prepositional Object Case Requirement

Prepositions create grammatical relationships. They connect nouns or pronouns to other sentence parts. The noun or pronoun following a preposition is called its object.

Objects require objective case in English. You say “with him” not “with he.” You say “to them” not “to they.” Same rule: you say “of whom” not “of who.”

The construction [some + of + objective case pronoun] is rigid. “Some of them” works. “Some of they” fails. And “some of whom” works. “Some of who” fails.

After any preposition (of, with, to, for, from), use “whom” not “who.” If you can replace it with “him/her/them,” use “whom.” If you can replace it with “he/she/they,” use “who.”

How Context Shapes Usage: Real-World Examples

Formal writing and casual speech treat “whom” differently. Understanding this split helps you choose correctly based on your audience.

Professional and Academic Writing

Academic papers, legal documents, and formal reports demand “whom” after prepositions. “The committee interviewed twelve candidates, some of whom had doctorate degrees.” Dropping “whom” here signals careless editing.

Business writing splits. Corporate reports use “whom” to signal professionalism. Emails relax the rule. “We hired five analysts, some of who started this week” appears in internal emails but not external communications.

Medical journals, scientific papers, and grant applications require “whom” without exception. Peer reviewers flag “who” after prepositions as grammatical error. This rule remains enforced in academic publishing despite spoken English abandoning it.

Casual Conversation and Social Media

Nobody says “some of whom” in normal conversation. You say “some of them” or restructure entirely. “Several people came—you know a few of them” replaces “Several people came, some of whom you know.”

Text messages, tweets, and Instagram captions never use “whom.” Social media language mirrors speech, where “whom” sounds pretentious. “Thanks to everyone who came, especially those of you who traveled far” replaces formal “especially those of whom traveled far.”

Dating app bios that use “whom” correctly signal education but risk sounding stuffy. “Looking for someone with whom I can travel” reads formal. “Looking for someone to travel with” sounds natural.

The Formality Gap: When Who Sounds Wrong

“Some of who” never works. Even in casual speech, native speakers avoid this construction because it feels off. Instead, they restructure: “Some people were there, and you knew a few of them.”

The rule persists because “of who” creates cognitive dissonance. Your brain processes “of them” easily. “Of they” sounds instantly wrong. “Of who” triggers the same wrongness signal, even if you don’t consciously know why.

Generational patterns matter. Older writers (Boomers, Gen X) consistently use “whom” after prepositions. Millennials use it in formal writing only. Gen Z increasingly skips it even in essays, prompting grammar debates online.

Literary Usage: How Classic Writers Handled Whom

Classic literature and modern journalism show the historical consistency and current flexibility of this grammar rule.

Historical Usage in Classic Texts

Jane Austen wrote in Pride and Prejudice (1813): “Elizabeth found herself quite equal to the scene, and could observe the three ladies before her with whom she had once been intimate.” Austen uses “whom” after “with” because prepositions required objective case in formal 19th-century prose.

Charles Dickens wrote in Great Expectations (1861): “There were some people slinking about, of whom I saw nothing more than shadows.” Dickens chose “whom” after “of” consistently throughout his novels. Victorian grammar demanded it.

Notice these authors never used “who” after prepositions. The rule was absolute. Breaking it would have signaled illiteracy or careless editing.

Modern Professional Writing Patterns

Contemporary journalism maintains “whom” in formal contexts. The New York Times style guide requires it. “The panel included five experts, some of whom specialized in climate science” appears regularly in feature articles.

Legal writing preserves “whom” rigorously. Contracts state “parties to whom notice must be sent” not “parties to who notice must be sent.” Law firms view “of who” as unprofessional error showing inadequate legal training.

Tech industry writing relaxes formality. Startup blogs write “We hired engineers, some of who came from Google” despite grammar checkers flagging it. Silicon Valley prioritizes speed over grammatical precision, accelerating “whom’s” decline.

Synonyms and Alternatives: The Objective Case Family

Understanding related grammatical structures clarifies when “whom” belongs and when alternatives work better.

The Him/Them Test for Whom

The classic trick works: rewrite the sentence replacing “whom/who” with “him/them” or “he/they.” Whichever sounds right tells you which to use.

Test: “Some of whom attended” vs “Some of who attended.” Rewrite: “Them attended” vs “They attended.” “They attended” sounds right, suggesting you need subjective case. But wait—”some of” requires objective case for its object. “Some of them” not “some of they.” The confusion comes from testing the wrong part. Test the phrase after “of” alone: “of them” (objective) matches “of whom” (objective).

“With” behaves identically. “The people with whom I work” tests as “I work with them” (objective), confirming “whom.” “The people with who I work” tests as “I work with they” (wrong), rejecting “who.”

Visualizing Case Relationships

Grammar chart showing subjective pronouns (who/he/she/they) separate from objective pronouns (whom/him/her/them), with arrow indicating prepositions require objective case only.

Alternative Constructions That Avoid Whom

Restructure sentences to dodge “whom” entirely. “Several candidates applied, some of whom were qualified” becomes “Several candidates applied—some were qualified” or “Several qualified candidates applied.”

Replace “of whom” with “of them” or “of these.” “Five people volunteered, some of whom were experts” becomes “Five people volunteered. Some of them were experts.”

Use “including” constructions. “Ten attended, some of whom were board members” becomes “Ten attended, including some board members.”

Common Mistakes: The Error Patterns

Writers make predictable errors with “some of whom vs some of who” based on overcorrection or undercorrection.

Incorrect	Correct	The Fix
Some of who were present voted yes	Some of whom were present voted yes	“Of” requires objective case. Use “whom” after any preposition.
Several witnesses, some of who lied, testified	Several witnesses, some of whom lied, testified	“Of” demands objective case. “Whom” is the only option after prepositions.
The team hired 12 people, some of who left	The team hired 12 people, some of whom left	Test with “them”—”some of them left” confirms you need objective “whom.”
I met colleagues, some of which were helpful	I met colleagues, some of whom were helpful	“Which” refers to things, not people. Use “whom” for people after “of.”
Many applied, all of whom we rejected them	Many applied, all of whom we rejected	Don’t add “them” after “whom.” “Whom” already functions as the object.

Psychological Trigger: Hypercorrection drives “who” misuse after prepositions. You learned “whom” sounds formal and old-fashioned. Your brain defaults to simpler “who” everywhere, including after prepositions where “whom” remains mandatory.

Alternatively, overcorrection drives “whom” misuse in subject position. You learn “whom” sounds educated. You deploy it incorrectly in “whom was present” (should be “who was present” because subjects take nominative case).

Practical Tips and Field Notes

Master this rule using simple tests and building muscle memory through practice.

The Editor’s Field Note

In 2015, while editing a medical research grant, I found 23 instances of “patients of who” scattered through 40 pages. The lead researcher, a brilliant immunologist, had never learned this rule despite publishing 50+ papers.

I remember the call. Conference room. Red ink everywhere. “Dr. Chen,” I said, “you write ‘of who’ but you’d never say ‘of they.’ You say ‘of them.’ Same rule applies—’of whom’ not ‘of who.'”

Silence. Then: “But nobody says ‘whom’ anymore.”

“True,” I countered. “Speech has abandoned it. But NIH grant reviewers expect formal grammar. They’ll think you didn’t proofread. ‘Of who’ signals carelessness, not just casualness.”

We fixed all 23 instances. The grant won funding—$2.3 million over five years. Did “whom” matter? Maybe not. But sloppy grammar creates doubt about research rigor. Reviewers judge writing quality as proxy for thinking quality.

The deadline crunch had been brutal—three days to polish before submission. Under pressure, Dr. Chen defaulted to speech patterns. She said “of who” naturally. Her fingers typed what she heard. Nobody speaks “whom” anymore, so errors creep into formal writing when time runs short.

Memory Tricks and Quick Tests

Use “them vs they” substitution. If “them” fits, use “whom.” If “they” fits, use “who.” After prepositions, “them” always fits, so “whom” always wins.

Remember: Prepositions require “me/him/her/them/whom.” Never “I/he/she/they/who.” Lock that pattern into memory.

When uncertain, restructure. Change “candidates, some of whom passed” to “candidates—some passed” or “some candidates passed.” Avoiding “whom” entirely beats guessing wrong.

Conclusion

“Some of whom” is correct because “of” is a preposition requiring objective case. “Whom” provides that case. “Who” provides subjective case, which doesn’t work after prepositions.

English inherited case marking from Old English but lost most of it by 1500. “Whom” survived in formal writing after prepositions even though speech dropped it. Your brain struggles because the rule feels unnatural—modern English rarely marks case this way.

Master the preposition test. After “of,” “with,” “to,” “for,” “from,” “about,” use “whom.” Test sentences by replacing “whom/who” with “them/they.” Match the case that sounds right.

Formal writing still demands “whom” after prepositions. Academic journals, legal documents, and professional reports flag “of who” as error. Casual speech ignores the rule entirely. Choose based on context and audience.

FAQs