Use the indicative “if she was” for real past possibilities and factual reports; use the subjunctive “if she were” for counterfactual, unreal, or hypothetical situations. Contrarian insight: Modern colloquial English often treats “if she was” and “if she were” interchangeably in speech — but in formal registers, “if she were” still signals counterfactuality and is the safer choice in legal, academic, or editorial contexts.
In the context of English grammar, if she was or if she were functions as a comparative conditional locus contrasting indicative and subjunctive moods for past-time hypotheticals and counterfactuals: it surfaces where speakers choose between plain past-tense report (was) and the subjunctive (were) that marks unreality, politeness, or hypothetical distancing.
How to Read This Piece: I will give rules, fixes, region notes, mutation patterns, idioms, a quick cheat sheet, a decision table, and a short editor’s field note.
Contextual Usage & Mechanics
What each form signals
- If she was — Indicative past. Signals that the speaker treats the clause as reporting or considering something that may have occurred or might have occurred in ordinary time. Example: If she was late, I missed her call. (Root verb: was — simple past, indicative mood.)
- If she were — Subjunctive. Marks unreality, wishes, or hypotheticals that are contrary to fact. Example: If she were here, we would start. (Root verb: were — past subjunctive, used for counterfactual conditionals.)
Strictly speaking, the difference is mood: indicative versus subjunctive. Use depends on whether you treat the condition as factual/possible or unreal/impossible.
Parts of speech and sentence anatomy
- Subject: she — pronoun, nominative.
- Verb: was/were — past-tense forms of be. Root: be; tense: past; aspect: simple.
- Clause type: subordinate conditional (protasis).
- Main clause (apodosis): will vary — e.g., I called (past factual), we would start (counterfactual consequence).
Mechanics check: subject-verb agreement is trivial here because “she” requires singular. The only complexity is that the verb form differs for mood, not number, in modern English: grammatically we still write “were” for subjunctive with singular subjects.
Standard vs Non-standard usage
Standard (formal): If she were taller, she would reach the shelf.
Non-standard (colloquial, casual): If she was taller, she would reach the shelf. — common in speech, accepted in informal writing but flagged in edited formal prose.
Examples with full POS breakdown
- If she was (if = subordinating conjunction; she = pronoun; was = past indicative of be) late, I missed the meeting. — Condition regarded as possible/past.
- If she were (if = subordinating conjunction; she = pronoun; were = past subjunctive of be) taller, she would reach the shelf. — Counterfactual; speaker signals unreality.
Why errors happen
People conflate mood and tense; they treat the subjunctive as archaic. Also, in many dialects, the indicative past is the default, so speakers use “was” across contexts. That is a semantic drift from strict prescriptive norms to descriptive reality.
The Correction Log (Common Mistakes & Fixes)
Incorrect → Correct. Explanation follows each pair.
- Incorrect: If she was the manager, she would approve it.
Correct: If she were the manager, she would approve it.
Why: The sentence posits a hypothetical role contrary to fact; subjunctive required to mark unreality. - Incorrect: I’d have gone if she were here.
Correct: I’d have gone if she had been here.
Why: Tense mismatch. For past-counterfactual conditions about a past time, English uses past perfect in the if-clause (had been) and perfect conditional in the main clause (would have). The error stems from mixing mood with tense. - Incorrect: If she was at the office, then she’s fine.
Correct: If she was at the office, then she’s fine. (This is acceptable.)
Why: Here the speaker treats the if-clause as speculative about a real past event; no subjunctive required. - Incorrect: If she were to arrive, I will leave.
Correct: If she were to arrive, I would leave.
Why: Mixed conditional: modal alignment needed—subjunctive hypothetical should pair with conditional modal (would), not simple future (will). The error arises from mismatch of conditionality and real futurity.
Analysis of why errors occur: Most mistakes come from failing to match mood with reality status, or from tense-slippage when the timeframe is past rather than present. Editors should check for: mood, timeframe, and modal alignment.
Regional Variance (American vs. British English)
Overview: Both American and British English historically recognize the subjunctive. In modern usage, American English retains the subjunctive more in certain fixed constructions (I insist that he be present), while British English often uses modal or indicative forms. For “if she were,” both varieties allow it for counterfactuals, but Americans may feel slightly more comfortable using it in formal writing. That said, in speech both variants commonly use “if she was” interchangeably.
Direct statement: The distinction is not universally widened by region; the rule is not “Universally Standardized” in spoken registers. In formal writing, prefer “if she were” for counterfactuals.
Syntactic Mutations (Questions & Negatives)
Question forms
- Neutral question about past possibility: Was she late? (do-support not needed for be)
- Embedded question with conditional: Do you know if she was late? — if-clause remains indicative for reported fact.
- Hypothetical question: What would happen if she were here? — subjunctive retained in hypotheticals.
Negatives
- If she was not available, I left a message. (Indicative negative — factual past)
- If she were not available, we would cancel. (Subjunctive negative — hypothetical)
Do-support? Not required with be in past tense forms. We do not use “did” with be: Did she were is ungrammatical. For other verbs, do-support appears in past tense yes/no questions and negatives, but be behaves irregularly.
Edge transformations
- In questions that invert the conditional (rare), the subjunctive may be fronted: Were she taller, she could reach it. — This inversion is formal and marks a subjunctive hypothetical.
Idiomatic Expressions & Collocations
Common set phrases where forms appear:
- If she were to (do X) — idiom for polite hypothetical planning. Literal: invites a hypothetical action. Figurative: a tentative scenario. Example: If she were to accept, we’d celebrate.
- If she was telling the truth — collocation often used in reporting (literal: conditional on a factual claim). Example: If she was telling the truth, the record shows it.
- As if she were (doing X) — a fixed comparative subjunctive construction: She looked as if she were lost. (Figurative: likening; literal: the comparison.)
- If she was ever (to…) — colloquial near-synonym of “If she were ever” but with a temporal slant. Example: If she was ever interested, now is the time.
- Suppose she were/was — both forms appear; choose were for counterfactual hypotheticals, was for reported past suppositions.
For each, check the intended meaning: figurative vs literal, possible vs impossible. That determines mood.
Table: Comparing “If She Was or If She Were” vs. Common Confusable “If She Was”
| Context | If She Was or If She Were | If She Was (Competitor) |
| Use case | Clarifies choice between indicative and subjunctive for past-time conditions. | Indicative only: reports or speculates about real past events. |
| Usage | Formal counterfactuals prefer “if she were”; factual pasts use “if she was”. | Default in colloquial speech; may be ambiguous for hypotheticals. |
| Tone | Formality depends on selection; “were” = formal/precise; “was” = neutral. | Neutral to informal; rarely signals unreality. |
| Syntax | Subordinate conditional (protasis) + mood choice; pairs with would/would have for apodosis. | Subordinate conditional treated as indicative past; pairs with simple past or present. |
| Example | If she were chief, she would change policy. / If she was late, I called her. | If she was late, I called her. (Ambiguous for hypothetical reading.) |
The Cheat Sheet
- If X = You mean a real past possibility → Then use “if she was.”
- If X = You mean a present or past counterfactual (contrary to fact) → Then use “if she were.”
- If X = You describe politeness, wishes, or tentative hypotheticals → Then use “if she were” or “if she were to…”
- If X = Reported speech about past events → Then use “if she was.”
- If X = Formal legal, academic, or editorial context and doubt exists → Then prefer “if she were” to avoid ambiguity.
From the Editor’s Desk: A Field Note
I once received a twenty-page legal affidavit where a conditional switched mid-paragraph: “If she was to authorize the transfer, then title would pass,” later followed by “If she were to deny it, the claim would fail.” I deleted the mixed moods and standardized the protases to reflect the factual timeline: past-perf structures for past-counterfactuals and subjunctive for clearly hypothetical scenarios. It fixed liability ambiguity. Editors: the mood you choose can change legal outcomes. Small change. Big consequence.
Decomposing Examples
Example 1: If she were taller, she would reach the shelf.
- If = subordinating conjunction (marks subordinate clause).
- She = pronoun, 3rd person singular, nominative case.
- Were = past subjunctive of be (mood: subjunctive; tense: past-form).
- Taller = comparative adjective modifying subject (predicative complement).
- Main clause: she would reach (would = modal auxiliary indicating conditional; reach = bare infinitive).
Mechanics check: subjunctive mood (were) signals unreal present; modal alignment (would) expresses consequence in an unreal conditional. Null hypothesis: If you used “was,” the sentence could be read as referring to an uncertain real possibility, weakening the counterfactual force.
Example 2: If she had been present, we would have started.
- Had been = past perfect (pluperfect) used for past counterfactuals.
- Would have started = perfect conditional (result of past counterfactual).
Mechanics check: For past counterfactuals, use past perfect in the if-clause; use conditional perfect in the main clause.
Conclusion
The golden rule: Use “if she were” for unreal, hypothetical, or contrary-to-fact conditions; use “if she was” for factual, reported, or possible past scenarios. Apply this rule to preserve clarity. If in doubt and you are writing for a formal audience—use “if she were.” If tone is conversational and the clause refers to a real past event, “if she was” is natural. Choose deliberately. Edit ruthlessly.
FAQs
If she was or if she were signals indicative versus subjunctive mood. Use “was” for reported past; “were” for counterfactuals. Short answer: mood controls meaning.
If she were marks an unreal or hypothetical condition. It shows the speaker is imagining, not reporting. Use it in wishes and counterfactuals.
If she was indicates real past; if she were indicates unreal hypothetical. Check whether the event is factual or contrary to fact.
No, you do not always need “were” after if. Use “were” only when the condition is contrary to reality; otherwise “was” is correct.
No, strictly speaking “if she was” is not always wrong. It is standard for factual past references; it becomes questionable only when used to express clear counterfactuals in formal registers.
If she were denotes present or general counterfactual; if she had been denotes past counterfactual. Use had been for events that could have happened before now.
As if she were almost always takes the subjunctive in formal usage. In colloquial speech, you may hear “as if she was,” but formal register favors “were.”
Yes, “if she was” commonly appears in reported speech. It reports a possible past state without implying unreality.
No, “if she were” is not archaic; it is the correct subjunctive for counterfactuals. It remains current in formal writing and careful speech.





